|
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 4 Days ago through Blogs | 1 Point
What are you trying to accomplish?...
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 1 Months ago through Blogs | 1 Point
Rather than adding a single user (who can be deleted or removed over time), create an AD Group or a Local Group, then make the members of that group a member of the [sysadmin] server role.
This way, an AD Administrator can add an individual to the gr...
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 2 Months ago through Blogs | 1 Point
>> Some other packages are running on 64-bit provider too in same machine. I was getting this issue for only for one package among them
Are all the packages running under the same security context?...
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 2 Months ago through Blogs | 1 Point
The problem is you have the 32-bit provider installed, but not the 64-bit provider. By forcing the package into 32-bit mode, it's able to communicate with the provider....
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 2 Months ago through Blogs | 1 Point
@hicham4
Given that you will have a large number of respondents and large number of questions, it's probably a better idea to perform the pivot in a reporting tool like SQL Server Reporting Services (using a Tablix), Access (using a CrossTab query) o...
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 2 Months ago through Blogs | 1 Point
The solution provided really isn't appropriate for a pivot. It's more like a column expansion, like this:
SELECT [p].[seq],
CASE WHEN [p].[ItemColour] = 'Red' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END as [Red],
CASE WHEN [p].[ItemColour] = 'Blue' TH...
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 3 Months ago through Blogs | 1 Point
The problem isn't that the columns have the same name, the problem is that the query processor can't know WHICH column to order by; HumanResources.Employee.BusinessEntityID or HumanResources.EmployeePayHistory.BusinessEntityID
The solution is to use ...
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 3 Months ago through Blogs | 1 Point
That is the nature of the float data type. It is an INEXACT approximate numerical representation and should be rarely used. If you need to store and retrieve a number like 123,456,789, use [int[ with a range of (-2,147,483,648) to (2,147,483,647).
...
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 4 Months ago through Blogs | 1 Point
Next time, rather than spreading the logs over multiple "drives", create a RAID0 stripe. This way you'll get the benefit of all the drives bandwidth.
* RISK * RAID 0 is not fault-tolerant. If you lose one drive, you lose them all....
|
-
Marc Jellinek Commented 4 Months ago through Blogs | 1 Point
Why create multiple log files?...
|